On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 20:03 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

> I have seen this bug has been fixed for GNU/Hurd, but not for
> GNU/kFreeBSD. Please find attached an updated patch to do that. Thanks
> in advance.
> 
Yes, this was because Hurd is part of sid and none of the BSD ports yet
are.  I know that sounds like a bit Chicken & Egg, but I have a better
solution to fix all of them at once that I'd like to implement -- rather
than putting a list of 40-odd architectures in there now.

I intend to implement support for "wildcard" architectures, which will
be valid in the Build-Depends line; e.g. libselinux1-dev [linux-any].

That's the intended solution to _this_ bug.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to