On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:24:36AM +0200, Daniel Kraft wrote: > Well. So that was kind of a brown-paper-bag bugreport.
> I had been certain that I had checked the hard limits for the first > report, but I can't reproduce any problem now either, even with the > old kernel. I'm sorry. It's a common mistake, and I was genuinely concerned that there was a regression here given the degree to which the pam_limits handling has been in flux, so I thank you for the bug report all the same. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
