Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 22:58 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
> Shouldn't it be assigned to libgtk2.0-0 instead, since this appeared here 
> after upgrade of that package logged as :
> libgtk2.0-0 2.14.7-5 -> 2.16.1-2 ?
> 
> Appart from that, any update ?

According to Philipp Kaluza this should be fixed in experimental.

-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'   “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
  `-     future understand things”  -- Jörg Schilling

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Reply via email to