On Thursday 14 May 2009 05:19:51 Martin Storsjö wrote: > One of the main things to do would be to rename the actual libs, I think, > so it doesn't conflict with the old libamr; that'd ease development on a > machine when transitioning from one version to another. That'd require > some minor patches to ffmpeg to make it able to use a similar library with > a new name. Or if the interfaces would be made binary compatible (by > prefixing e.g. the Decoder_Interface_Decode symbol with GP3 as in the old > libamr), it perhaps could be made a fullblown drop-in replacement - I'm > not too familiar with all the details in debian packaging in how to > accomplish that cleanly, though, so it doesn't break installation of old > packages depending on libamr.
I would like this to be a drop in replacement for at least the libamr-nb library and the libamr-wb decoder. > > Also, were you able to contact the author of the original libamr > > libraries? > > I never actually got round to contacting him, actually. I'll contact him then. -- Regards, Andres
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
