Hi, At Fri, 15 May 2009 11:17:56 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2009, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > > Perhaps it's better to advertize the use of mk-build-deps and keep our > > > own implementation (which needs to avoid extra deps) minimal? > > What are the extra dependencies? I use only “sed” which is already used > > in pbuilder (“head” can be avoided). > > I'm speaking of the extra dependencies of mk-build-deps. > > mk-build-deps: makes what you want, depends on stuff which we don't > want to install in pbuilder chroots (e.g. equivs, > debhelper) > pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude: doesn't make what you want, but > doesn't depend on extra stuff > > We can't switch pbuilder from pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude to > mk-build-deps because of the deps; I'm not tempted to make > pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude more complex if you have another > option (mk-build-deps).
I'd agree, let's leave pbuilder-satisfydepends-aptitude alone. -- dan...@{netfort.gr.jp,debian.org} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org