reopen 175744 thanks > in the meantime we reworked the filtering mechanism so we now use > amavis with spamassassin and we have a whitelist. > > A Moderation for some 'grey' articles would be a nice thing, but > as that would need Moderators and Implementation this is a wontfix > now. > > As this bug is rather old i close it now, feel free to re-open it with > some words about your opinion of the current situation.
If you are still using spamassassin, then it is almost sure that the initial message in this report still holds: The more the spamicity of a message, the greater the probability that the message is spam. Of course this proposal would need moderators, but there are already volunteer people who report "this message is spam" in the listarchives. So it's not Moderators what we don't have but willingness to code an implementation. Why not tag this bug "help" instead of "wontfix" then? I thought it was pretty obvious that it's better to stop the spam before it's sent than to remove it from the list archives after it has been distributed to thousands of people. So if you are doing campaign for people to click in the "report spam" button, please start thinking about this proposal of moderating messages, as it would be a lot more optimal way to avoid spam. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
