On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:51:58AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > That makes sense.
> > 
> > But could we do it transparently, i.e., have people write something
> > like:
> > 
> > http://sf.net/project/...
> > 
> > in their watchfile and uscan do the translation automatically.  Then
> > if something stops working, we either modify the php script or uscan,
> > and only one package needs fixing, rather than hardwiring a hack into
> > all of these watchfiles.
> This makes sense too; but its still subpar.  If uscan doesn't work for
> people, they'll complain, at best, or just hardcode an sf.net URL that
> Works For Them, which breaks for everyone outside a mirror zone, or on
> days ending in 'y'.  I think uscan has to work all the time, not just
> after a 2.5 day "high priority upload" grace period.  Otherwise people
> will upload when they're done updating their package, because they
> don't feel like waiting for uscan (or fiddling with unstable), and
> (correctly) don't feel like guessing the right syntax and hoping it
> works, or they just forget.

So could we have uscan simply translate

http://sf.net/project/...

in a watchfile into

http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/project/...

The former makes more sense for the end user than having to put the
latter in a watchfile manually.

   Julian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to