On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 19:12:34 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > I don't see exactly what point you try to make here. From a technical > point of view, I see some advantages to handle this minor upgrade in the > same way as an ABI transition (the strongest one being to ensure that > the old packages do not lie around). > An ABI transition is not handled by breaking parallel installability.
> This can be of course discussed but I don't see exactly the point to > discuss it outside of the bug report, with the sponsor and > ftpmasters. And I don't see what exactly is the contribution of saying > that it is "severely brain-damaged". Will you yell at ftpmasters/mentors > each time you see that a package is not perfect? His point is that this isn't a case of 'not perfect'. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
