On 2009-05-30 Rocco Rutte <pd...@gmx.net> wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> I then find this in the SMTP connection:
>> SMTP<< MAIL FROM:<ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org>
>> SMTP>> 250 OK
>> SMTP<< RCPT TO:<undisclosed-recipients>
> Mutt adds this to To: first and then uses this one
> for RCPT TO. The code has this comment:
> /* some MTA's will put an Apparently-To: header field showing the Bcc:
> * recipients if there is no To: or Cc: field, so attempt to suppress
> * it by using an empty To: field.
> */
> So this seems like a feature rather than a bug though
> I don't know if this still holds.
I do not follow at all. :-(
Using "undisclosed-recipients: ;" in the To: header is perfectly fine
(see rfc 2822 A.1.3. Group addresses), however passing it in the
envelope (rcpt to) is a bug.
cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
http://downhill.aus.cc/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
