> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:30:26PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what's the status? > > I've been waiting for the jackd folk to reply to my query about how we > are going to manage transitions with this. This codec is currently > experimental, not even the bitstream is guaranteed to be compatible > between releases -- so we need some clear plan for how to manage that, > or it's going to be a real mess.
Hi, any news on this? IMHO everybody who currently uses this codec should be made aware of the fact that it's completely experimental still and things will break in the future. IMHO you should update to the new version, rename packages for soname changes, and then let everybody who already uses CELT handle any problems that might appear (like old files can't be played anymore ...). Staying at an old version of such an experimental codec is no solution, instead it will only make problems worse as more and more files with the old bitstream are created.
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
