On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:35:45PM +0200, Werner Baumann wrote:
> davfs2 is ignorant about the difference between libneon27 and
> libneon27-gnutls. It takes whatever the libneon developer package offers
> (using /usr/bin/neon-config to detect the neon library, no configure
> option needed).
> I don't know of any problems with using the gnutls version and to avoid
> license complications using gnutls is preferred.
>...
We seem to miss each other here.
The Debian package of davfs2 currently has a build dependency on
libneon27-dev, which is the OpenSSL version.
What I'd like to see would be the build dependency of the Debian
package changed to libneon27-gnutls-dev, which is the gnutls version.
This is not an upstream issue, but an issue in the Debian packaging.
> Cheers
> Werner
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
