Hi Helge, On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:19:45 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> On April 10th 2008 you said you were going to ask debian-legal about > this issue so I asked if your rewrite was prompted by that discussion. Oops, I forgot it and I just asked debian-legal about the issue. More precisely, I didn't understand the issue precise enough to ask debian-legal about it in the past. And my rewrite is only following an update of Wolfram web page. > From my viewpoint, however, the new version is not problematic in this > regard simply because the license itself is contained in the template > anymore (though I do at present not fully understand how the user > knows about the content of the license). I'm afraid you misunderstand here. The license itself is contained in a new package also. It is not in a part to be translated. So the problem (if any) is there in a new package and/but the content of the license is displayed to a user definitely. Regards, 2009-6-26(Fri) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org> Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
