Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 11:36 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess: > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > ah, ok, so that is an implicit re-assign of the bug to xmonad? I read it > > in the ghc6 context. > > Oops, as you maintain them both, I had not realized this bug was > currently assigned to ghc6 rather than xmonad.
heck, no, I don’t maintain ghc6. I’m thankful that kaol does that :-) > Yes, I think this bug should go back to xmonad, maybe as a clone. xmonad > currently has this annoying usability problem across ghc6 upgrades, and > it could be fixed to avoid it. Note that, as far as I know, it is not a problem across any ghc6 upgrade, but just this particular one, and only on 64bit architectures. (Kaol applied a patch that made sure .haddock files are arch-independent which also affected .hi files). Future upgrades will not have this problem, thus I’m reluctant to diverte from upstream to fix it – probably most users have done the work-around by now. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
