Hi Vitaliy, On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:07:31PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote: > On Monday 20 April 2009 08:01:59 pm Vitaliy Gusev wrote: > > Hi, Tom. I will prepare and send patch to you in two-three days. > > Sorry for late response, but I was busy. > > Hello, Tom!. Does this problem still actual for you? Can you check > attached patch? ( do not tune off CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE)
This patch makes sense. I have applied it to the latest Debian Lenny kernel and will let you know what happens! Thanks, Tom > diff --git a/kernel/bc/net.c b/kernel/bc/net.c > index e1ffc63..fb0fb25 100644 > --- a/kernel/bc/net.c > +++ b/kernel/bc/net.c > @@ -157,9 +157,9 @@ static void ub_sock_snd_wakeup(struct user_beancounter > *ub) > * act the same way as ub_tcp_snd_wakeup does. > */ > sock_hold(sk); > - read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); > spin_unlock(&ub->ub_lock); > > + read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); > sk->sk_write_space(sk); > read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); > > @@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ static void ub_tcp_snd_wakeup(struct user_beancounter *ub) > * it belongs to the callback. > */ > sock_hold(sk); > - read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); > spin_unlock(&ub->ub_lock); > > + read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); > sk->sk_write_space(sk); > read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); -- -- Tom Rathborne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
