On Jul 11, md wrote: > > Having udev disable itself on reboot and leaving the system > > non-functional is not an acceptable solution. Most systems have > I disagree, this is what udev has done since last year and so far > nobody ever complained, so it's obviously not such a bad solution. I need to clarify that I had not seen #317720 yet. The package was supposed to refuse to be installed too if an older version of udev is already running.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
