On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 05:24:31PM +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I also am trying to keep track of several similar packages with > data-only contents. > > Perhapse the fix for this would be a package tag maintainers could add > that specify a file for popcon to test. Sort of like a "use details > available about this file if it exists".
I do not like the idea of allowing package maintainers to tweak packages to improve their ranking. > Or if that is not possile, defaulting to checking the changelog. (which > every package has right?) What would be the point ? There is nearly zero correlation between the time someone read the changelog and someone use a package, *especially* for data-only packages. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
