On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 03:07:10PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >you may want to delay merging this patch given that it looks like Otavio >asked for not using libbsd udebs for now. I'm guessing Aurélien is going >to talk with Otavio about that.
libedit2 2.11-20080614-1 is already in testing and depends on libbsd0. I think libedit2 is used by D-I (openssh depends on it) but I may be wrong. If that's the case, libbsd0 should be part of D-I. Also. guillem told me a few minutes ago that libbsd0 is a very small library and having rdate depending on libbsd0 is better than having this error message from the linux kernel.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
