Personally, I don't like to close automatically WNPP bugs (ITP/RFP). Probably the best move is to retitle ITP to RFP after a certain amount of time (like 1 year of inactivity, as used by that script) and leave it there.
RFP should be closed if the upstream project went dead, and left open if still alive so that perspective (new) maintainer can find it and take over it. my 2 cents, Sandro On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 11:41, Niels Thykier<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I have been trying to reach "David Moreno Garza > <[email protected]>", however the email is no longer valid. Doing > a little google search I am guessing that "[email protected]" is your new > email address. If this is not the case, please disregard this email. > > > > There has been a long wish for a script that could assist the debian-qa > team in locating old wnpp bugs. > > Lucas mentioned[1] that you used to have a script running that > automatically closes old bugs[2]. If you still have it and it is still > works, we could perhaps re-instate it and have this bug solved. Even if > it does not work any longer, it could prove useful as reference. > > ~Niels > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=264774#25 > [2] Like this one: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=137712#22 > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > > -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
