Gary Dale a écrit :
I tried it with both the source and compiled modules with the same
results. They installed without problems. However, apart from the
higher refresh rate I'm getting with the fglrx driver, there's not a
lot of difference between this and the vesa driver. The vesa driver
still gives a faster display but with some flickering. This is the
same result I got with manually installing the ATI drivers from the
AMD web site.
Prior to upgrading to the 2.6.30 kernel, I was getting great results
from the fglrx driver. Windows would drag smoothly and become
semi-transparent. I could use the X video extensions for video output
from Kaffeine, vlc & mplayer (but the GL video didn't work). And I
was getting a lot of desktop effects, such as virtual desktops sliding
from one to another.
Any ideas on why the current driver's performance is so pitiful?
So we are getting closer ! Did you build the module with
module-assistant ? And could you attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log ?
Thanks
Bertrand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
