On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:13:31PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Then I checked the unstable archive, and I found only 6 occurrences at all of > such Pre-Depends: > > -8<- > $ cupt pkgnames | xargs -n5000 cupt depends --important | grep Pre-Depends | > egrep '[^<>]=' > Pre-Depends: bacula-common (= 3.0.2-2) > Pre-Depends: libcherokee-config0 (= 0.99.22-1) > Pre-Depends: kaffe-common (= 2:1.1.8-5.2) > Pre-Depends: bacula-common (= 3.0.2-2) > Pre-Depends: kaffe-common (= 2:1.1.8-5.2) > Pre-Depends: e2fslibs (= 1.41.9-1) > ->8- > > I'm now wondering whether [some of] these relations are justified. Added the > maintainer of e2fsprogs to the thread. > > Maybe, I'm wrong and there is the action chain that allows policy-compliant > upgrade in this case? Please describe it then to me.
apt-get handles this fine, so it is possible. I'm assuming it's something along the lines of the following. deconfigure e2fsprogs deconfigure e2fslibs unpack e2fslibs configure e2fslibs unpack e2fsprogs configure e2fsprogs If you don't need my system to stay in its current state for further debugging, I can upgrade with apt-get and see what it does to verify. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
