On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:43:39PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > The problem pointed out is that dicod should work with 0.2.26-2 or gsasl > should have broken ABI and needed a soversion bump or there is a broken > build that should be fixed with either gsasl (through a symbols or > shlibs file) or dicod. > > So, this still needs some investigation, which I intend to do soon. >
OK. My investigation is done. GSASL includes library symbol versioning since version 1.1. This is even considering as beneficial for Debian. And it is, if we use the symbols file, it is easier just including wildcards and let the library symbol versioning do the work for us. Since I trust Josefsson to do the right thing in respect to library maintenance, I'd say our job in maintaining this symbols file would be rather easier with the libsymver. Since I am leaving right now for a work, no package upload will be done before the next 6 hours. As soon as I do it, I will ask the maintainers of packages depending on libgsasl and built with version 1.1 to do a rebuild. Better, I will ask the release team to schedule a rebuild of all packages depending on it. Regards, Cascardo. > Thank you for clarifying. > > Regards, > Cascardo.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
