The new fileroller just hit testing.Note that rpm2cpio, and the new version of rpm that splits off that component, both currently live only in EXPERIMENTAL. Which is, I suspect, why the request for the change included an OR component (which was apparently typo-ed as to version number:
rpm2cpio | rpm (<< 2.7.1) which (I think) should be: rpm2cpio | rpm (<< 4.7.1) squeeze and sid both currently have 4.7.0-9 (rpm versions) experimental 4.7.1-2 (and at this moment amd64 only - autobuilding in process I suspect) rpm2cpio is built from the same source as rpm, and currently available versions are the same. aptitude wants to autoremove rpm (correctly based on the new fileroller), but offers no packages in it's place (since it lives in experimental). Now I can manually fix this easily enough (just have to decide which way to fix it - from experimental or reinstall rpm) but . . . In any case the original bug request appeared to be an early warning heads up, at this time the rpm recommends still needs to be in place. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
