Hello, On penktadienis 28 Rugpjūtis 2009 00:11:10 Joey Hess wrote: > Anyway, what did this have to do with debhelper? I guess I feel that > making debhelper work around flags set by dpkg-buildpackage is not a > productive use of time.
What I meant is that your dh examples for makefile are not 100% correct then... They need to suggest CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS handling or we are assuming dh is relying on dpkg-buildpackage to set those. So either: 1) Fix makefile.pm to set those. 2) Fix docs that maintainer should set those (absolute majority) and manually handle noopt deb build flags. But then debian/rules will not be minimal ... Anyway, I think that current assumption that debian/rules is run under dpkg- buildpackage and it sets those flags is fine for me... -- Modestas Vainius <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
