Insulting Ana? I do value her work as much as anybody else. I did not pretend to be rude to Ana. My apologies if it sounds that bad.
It was all about prioritizing QA. Anything that - Affect minimally to users - Affect minimally to developers - Affect minimally to the overall quality of the package and/or the distribution - Does not violate DP both in letter and/or spirit Should be considered low priority in my opinion. Of course you can ignore what I say. Regarding the title of the bug report note that I also explained why the title lead to confusion. A quick and dirty web page without any commitment to be maintained in the future is much worse than a subversion repository, which was the original source. Regards, F. Moya On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi dear overlord Francisco. > > I'm deeply sorry in advance for eating your great time, but I feel > compelled to reply, in particular to you (but I'm keeping the bug and > Ana in Cc for further reference). > > Francisco Moya <[email protected]> (30/08/2009): > > I do value my time, so please, do not CC me unless I request it. > > How the hell are we supposed to know you're going to get a reply? > You're not the maintainer, so unless you're subscribed to the PTS or > to the bug, nobody can know you're going to get a reply. Unless you > say so of course, which you didn't. > > Given you're also breaking the mail thread, one can only assume you > never got the reply. Not to mention that the policy on the BTS is > obviously to Cc everyone involved since there's no autosubscription. > > But maybe you're not *that* familiar to the BTS yet? > > > The file does not say anything about the content, it just provides > > an URI. Therefore there is nothing there that could possibly > > confuse people. If you wish a clarification on how to fetch the > > code then please, use a bug title which doesn't lead to more > > confusion. > > Given it's a *title* it can't really be as long as the body, which > covers your expectation. > > > I answered the bug report to reduce the severity, because the > > maintainer is not yet used to the Debian policy. For example, he > > made a quick and dirty web page because he thought he had to provide > > one due to your bug report. That's not the case. The source was > > taken from the svn repo and there is no official atheist page yet. > > It's too bad the maintainer can't read what Ana wrote. Or (XML-)parse > it properly. Or can't get from the requirements from the Policy. Or > whatever. > > > It seems you enjoy some spare time these days. Perhaps you are also > > interested on working on these bugs > > http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ > > You may want to stop insulting Ana. From what I've seen, she's the one > doing QA those days, _and_ working on RC bugs. Not you. > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Ana Guerrero <[email protected]> wrote: > > Top-posting and full-quoting? Nice job! > > Mraw, > KiBi. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkqahkMACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd1RcwCeNLHsB/J/r67N8uHajahLm7rO > gVAAoJD3TqAYMpFhqCstDM7eg/At87fw > =J5kE > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
