On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 21:01 +0000, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi Maintainer, > > your package (Build-)Depends on libgetopt++ which has been removed from > unstable. Maybe you want to take over maintainership of libgetopt++. Feel free > to ping me again when you have solved the problem.
Checking removals.txt I see it was removed solely because it had no reverse depends - not because of bugs or issues. Adeodata, do you want to keep maintaining this, or should I upload it again with me as maintainer? Easiest thing for me would be for the removal to just get reversed, then config-manager can come back in again. -Rob [Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:34:04 +0000] [ftpmaster: Joerg Jaspert] Removed the following packages from unstable: libgetopt++ | 0.0.2-p22-2 | source libgetopt++-dev | 0.0.2-p22-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libgetopt++1 | 0.0.2-p22-2 | alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 539172 ------------------- Reason ------------------- RoM; library without reverse dependencies ----------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
