Hi Francesco, On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:09:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote: > Package: rakarrack > Version: 0.3.0-1 > Severity: important > > > Hi! > Thanks for maintaining rakarrack in Debian!
Thank you for trying to use it on Debian :) > > I really cannot understand what's going on. > > It seems to me that the i386 binary package of rakarrack has not yet > been built: the build status [1] says "Building", the build log [2] > seems to indicate some unsatisfied dependency, and the package seems > to be missing from i386 mirrors. > > [1] https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=rakarrack > [2] > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=rakarrack;ver=0.3.0-1;arch=i386;stamp=1251308537 Actually it's not an unsatisfied dependency. It's a problem with alsa-utils 1.0.20-2. I've seen it's already reported, so I've reforced the need of fixing it soon. Now I noted 1.0.20-3 was pushed to Debian and it's supposed to solve this issue in rakarrack: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539983 Let's wait a little. According to the buildd log rakarrack was built against the broken alsa-utils 1.0.20-2. > Despite this lack of syncronization among architectures, the > package *did* migrate to testing [3] ! :-o > > [3] http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rakarrack/news/20090906T163952Z.html > > Maybe I am misinterpreting something. > > Could you please help me understand where's the problem (maybe a > bug in britney?), so that we can properly reassign this bug report? > Can this problem be solved for rakarrack? No, it's not a bug in britney. Please look: http://www.debian.org/devel/testing As you can see, a package doesn't need to be compiled in all archs to go to testing. Also, as I said, it's not a missing dependency issue. So, let's wait for the next build against the fixed alsa-utils. Regards, -- Tiago Bortoletto Vaz http://tiagovaz.org 0xA504FECA - http://pgp.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
