Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 02:49 +0400 schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:10:38PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > > would you please be so kind to examine bug #524149 and the packaging of blt? > > There are plenty of crash reports: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/524149 > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359857 (related report in Ubuntu) > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380346 (bkchem) > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305211 (python-pmw, pymol) > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297699 (pymol) > > > > (there are probably more in Debian/Ubuntu bug-trackers - I didn't check all > > dependencies of blt, python-pmw and the other) > > > > So this issue is a pain. > > Jeff Hobbs pointed out that bkchem bug > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/380346 (bkchem) > possibly caused by mixed 8.4 and 8.5 versions of libtcl loaded > at the same time, which can be seen in the backtrace. > bkchem depends on python-pmw which depends strictly on Tcl/Tk >= 8.5, > and BLT which depends on Tcl/Tk 8.5 or 8.4, so it might happen that the > user reported the crash has both versions of Tcl installed, and the > application is written in such a way that two versions of libtcl ended > up being linked to a process. > It would be nice if you forwarded this to the bkchem maintainers in > Ubuntu.
I can confirm, that the patch from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blt/+bug/359857/comments/2 "fixes" the crashes in bkchem. It further looks absolutely safe to me and might fix all crashes, in which the mixture of tcl 8.4 and 8.5 occured in the backtrace. @Chris: Would you please examine this short patch and apply it to the blt Debian package? Further the above mentioned bug report #359857 also contains a link to the RedHat bugzilla with another patch, which might also be worth to be checked. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
