Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:41:59AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>> Peter Pentchev wrote:
>>> As of writing, its only
>>> well-developed application is the provisioning of Internet domain names,
>>> hosts, and related contact details.
>> What about Net::DRI? Never used but heard good words about it.
> 
> Well, I've never used Net::DRI either, although it looks good.
> Still, I think there would be no harm in also having Net::EPP in
> Debian, since it is useful in its own right - easy to use, quite
> customizable, usable for lots of EPP-compatible registrars with
> only small registrar-specific changes.  At $REALJOB, we've been
> using it internally for EURid for quite some time now, with only
> a simple change of an XML element's namespace to make it work.
> 
> Of course, if the community feels that it is redundant, I can
> always maintain it myself outside of Debian, no worries :)
Oh, you misunderstood, I wasn't suggesting to not include it in Debian;
I was just wondering how the two packages relate or compare with each other.

Thanks,
Faidon



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to