Hi,

The analysis of the initial report is not correct.  The package
does build with Boost and much of Boost are header-only libraries.
So the lack of dependency on a Boost shared lib is perfectly normal.

The error is actually as reported in the diagnostic: the code tried to
get() the value of an un-set variable of type
boost::optional<source_section>.  I'm not familiar enough with the
code to judge, but I wonder whether this truly is grave?
Superficially, it looks like either a simple
inadequate-input-validation bug or a simple inadequate-fault-reporting
bug.

Regards,
-Steve

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to