Hello Sandro,
thanks for your answer. You are of course right with regard to the
easily fixable things.
On 2009-09-21 23:31 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 23:02, Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 2009-09-21 22:31 +0200, Ryan Niebur wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> why not just upload it as a QA upload?
>>
>> Because it's not really suited as such -- new upstream release with lots
>> of changes, lots of changes in the Debian packaging as well; that's a
>> bit invasive for a QA upload.
>
> ?? QA uploads are just like any other uploads, but they are done in
> the name of the QA team. that's all. So please go ahead.
I suppose I should subscribe to the PTS then and deal with any breakage
the upload may introduce, right?
>> | I: ne: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2424kB 89%
>
> could not be an issue.
If I'll ask for an RFS, I want to fix this first. Should not be too
difficult and would give me some packaging training.
> Please consider to fix those simple lintian warnings and then submit a
> RFS on debian-ment...@l.d.o: this way, your help would be much more
> effective.
Regardless of whether I do that or not, I have just asked to be added to
the collab-maint group so that I can put my Git repository there (don't
want to use my home directory on Alioth for that package).
Regards,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
