Hello!
[Sun, 17 Jul 2005] Malcolm Smith wrote:
> I believe this is because libjack0.100 conflicts with libjack0.80.
> This should not be the case -- why give them different names if they
> could not be installed simultaneously?
libjack0.100.0-0 does not conflict with libjack0.80.0-0.
If you uninstall jackd and leave it uninstalled during the next weeks,
no software will be needed to be removed.
Robert.
--
A Linux machine! because a 486 is a terrible thing to waste!
(By [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joe Sloan)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
