Initially, there was only an amd64 deb listed in the bug reply, and in the archives as well. The x86 version seemed to go up a few days later, and all is well.
Thanks! ;) On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 05:22:40PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El viernes, 18 de septiembre de 2009, azhr...@underhanded.org escribió: > > Thanks for the quick updates, is there an i686 version on the way as > > well? > > I beg you pardon? Why there should be such version of memcached? I > haven't > seen such improvement just by compiling with 686 flags, and anyway I'm more > than sure than almost none is using memcached seriously with x86 kernels, but > amd64 ones. -- ICQ: 116080581 | Jabber: azhr...@underhanded.org AIM/Y!: AzhrarnLOD | IRC: Azhrarn @ irc.chatspike.net ( Vim, Tabs, BSD Braces, Debian, and Perl )
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
