On Fri 25 Sep 2009, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > > I;m just happy that apache was not also upgraded at the same time, as it > > probably would have been stopped during this whole time. That would have > > sucked. > > It would - but I wonder if it's actually necessary at all for Apache to be > down during an upgrade of unrelated packages. Will investigate.
If you're upgrading multipla packages at once, it's not uncommon for a number of daemons belonging to those packages to be stopped, then those packages get configured, and then all the daemons are started again... So, yes, it's entirely possible that apache may be down during the upgrade of an unrelated package. That's the point I was trying to make :-) Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
