Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> I use quilt to manage patches of several projects.

I'm not going to begrudge your choice in management tools.  Quilt
seems quite capable, certainly.  The decision to require more advanced
patching tools for a BUILD environment is subjective, I feel, to the
complexity of the patches themselves.  If you were packaging Xorg or
XFree86, then I wouldn't have raised any concern.  However, since the
patching required is quite simple, why elevate the requirements for
the actual build environment?

In requiring someone to backport cdbs (which arguably isn't
difficult), you also require them to backport all of its dependencies
(which includes quilt) and their depenedencies.  Soon, you're building
a tree of packages.  For Xorg, this could be seen as a necessity, but
for mercurial, it is arguably overkill.

In any case, it was a wishlist request and nothing more.  I could just
as easily strip the dependencies out and make my own custom package,
but I really feel that it shouldn't be necessary.  Do as ye will. ;-)

(It looks like mercurial has just gotten a booster shot and now has
quilt-like capabilities as well.)
-- 
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>           http://www.wookimus.net/
           assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to