"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:16:32PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: >> When updating amoeba for the C++ transition, you appear to have >> inadvertently specified libglu1-mesa-dev rather than libglu1-xorg-dev >> as the preferred libglu-dev; since only the latter has undergone the >> transition so far, the result on many architectures is a dependency on >> libglu1 rather than libglu1c2. > > Eh, yes, that must be a mispaste. Thanks for noticing.
You're welcome. However, in retrospect, this is actually a non-bug per recent discussion on debian-devel -- it seems that because libGLU's use of libstdc++ is entirely internal, it is safe for libglu1-xorg to go back to providing libglu1 after all (though it will probably continue to provide libglu1c2 for at least a little while for the sake of early adopters). The discussion's in the thread starting with http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg00805.html though the relevant messages don't seem to have made it up yet. Anyway, my recommendation at this point would be to change libglu1-mesa-dev to libglu1-xorg-dev, but not to bother build-depending directly on the shared library. Thanks, and apologies for sending this before catching up with relevant list traffic. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
