Hi, I understand why e.g. the "fuse" rule has been removed from /etc/udev/rules.d/91-permissions.rules. But this breaks FUSE, because now /dev/fuse belongs to root.root instead of root.fuse, so no user is able to do a FUSE mount.
How's the policy here? Should the maintainer of libfuse2 put a rule into /etc/udev/rules.d? Then, a bug should be filed there. I've temporarily fixed this matter by adding # FUSE (see #532667) KERNEL=="fuse", GROUP="fuse" to /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kaaden [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
