tags 549007 +moreinfo
thanks

Heyho!

0.0.20090925svn1027805-1 here, too.

I don't use gmail, but I just tested the google account I use for AdSense 
and this works just fine.

Can you provide some more information?  Any messages in ~/.xsession-errors?  
Can you test with a new user or with all cookies and cookie accept policies 
reset to defaults etc.?

thanks
-- vbi

On Wednesday 30 September 2009 11.36:39 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: kpart-webkit
> Version: 0.0.20090925svn1027805-1
> Severity: important
> 
> In Konqueror, cookie setting have been enabled.
> 
> Khtml works perfectly with websites and can login in new tabs without
> asking additional information.
> 
> When using kpart-webkit, it complains that cookies aren't enabled and
> thus it can't login and asks me to try logging in again. Once I do that
> and open a new tab, it returns back to the same "Cookie not enabled"
> stage.
> 
> 
> Ritesh
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> 
> Versions of packages kpart-webkit depends on:
> ii  kdebase-runtime 4:4.3.1-1                runtime components from the
>  offici ii  kdelibs5        4:4.3.1-1                core libraries for
>  all KDE 4 appli ii  libc6           2.9-25                   GNU C
>  Library: Shared libraries ii  libqtcore4      4:4.5.2-2               
>  Qt 4 core module
> ii  libstdc++6      4.4.1-1                  The GNU Standard C++ Library
>  v3 ii  libwebkitkde1   0.0.20090925svn1027805-1 KDE bindings for WebKit
> 
> kpart-webkit recommends no packages.
> 
> kpart-webkit suggests no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 

-- 
The conundrum is not in which email, but in how many users. The number of
users would be inversely proportional to the question of, 'which email', and
could then likely be regurgitated as, 'what email', or so to speak. Since
the question of how many users bring us to the inevitable query of the email
itself, you have to start counting each user twice, and sometimes thrice in
order to come to a more accurate conclusion about what email.
        -- Darren V. in news.admin.net-abuse.email

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to