Jari Aalto dixit: >Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> writes:
>> Yes, but SUSv4 doesn’t say (or I could not find it) explicitly what >> to do with directories. > >It doesn't say about many things: context of symlinks, block devices etc. Indeed. That would probably be implementation-specific behaviour. […] >Does it not explicitly read <file> in all points? >The POSIX standard is perfectly clear on this: it says <file> and that >word does not have intereptation you suggest. Directories are files. You did not prove otherwise. SUSv4 does not (or I cannot find it) say that directories are *not* files. bye, //mirabilos -- Yay for having to rewrite other people's Bash scripts because bash suddenly stopped supporting the bash extensions they make use of -- Tonnerre Lombard in #nosec -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org