Jari Aalto dixit:
>Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> writes:
>> Yes, but SUSv4 doesn’t say (or I could not find it) explicitly what
>> to do with directories.
>
>It doesn't say about many things: context of symlinks, block devices etc.
Indeed. That would probably be implementation-specific behaviour.
[…]
>Does it not explicitly read <file> in all points?
>The POSIX standard is perfectly clear on this: it says <file> and that
>word does not have intereptation you suggest.
Directories are files. You did not prove otherwise.
SUSv4 does not (or I cannot find it) say that directories
are *not* files.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Yay for having to rewrite other people's Bash scripts because bash
suddenly stopped supporting the bash extensions they make use of
-- Tonnerre Lombard in #nosec
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
