On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:46:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:45:22AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > The Breaks thing sounds wrong. That should be the other way around. The > > ones breaking the others are the dictionaries breaking iceape and > > others, not iceape breaking the dictionaries... > > I disagree. iceape breaks the old ones by not looking at the place > wher they are anymore.
No, iceape is the one broken. Iceape, by being installed doesn't prevent the dictionaries to work in other software. On the other hand, the newer dictionaries, when installed, break iceape's handling of dictionaries. > But anyways, it's far too late now to change that, you can also > live without those Breaks:, but then you'll have trouble with partial updates > when the compat symlinks go away... Why don't you keep the compat symlink in squeeze ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
