Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Barry deFreese ([email protected]): > >> I was going to try to start from the newer upstream and see if I >> could fix the build system to just use automake 1.1x but it has >> sever reverse depends and I don't know the effect it might have on >> those. Do you have any thoughts on that? I'm happy to try to help >> with the autotools stuff. > > No, I don't have any thoughts..:) > > I went on this package because its templates were changed by the former > maintainer (Paul Slootman) when he uploaded the last version.... > > Paul actually apparently tried to fix every pending bug report in the > package before orphaning it (obvisouly because he ack'ed that, not > using it anymore he could not maintain it properly). > > So, my involvment there is just to bring back the debconf l10n to a > good shape and do a review of the rewritten debconf templates. And I > know nothing about the package. > > Stil, maybe Paul could give a small help in this. That might include > some hints about the need for the package nowadays. I can roughly > guess that ISDN stuff is much less widely used now...but that's only a > rought guess and I may be very wrong (some places, such as Germany, > had|have a quite wide development of ISDN so there may be people who > ar still using what's provided in the package. > > Hi folks,
Just wanted to let you know I am back working on this. I have a package that builds with the "newer" upstream. Right now I am moving all of the existing patches to quilt, then I am going to re-write the packaging using more debhelper stuff. I'll try to keep you updated. Thanks, Barry deFreese Debian QA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
