wikipediafs doesn't have any serious bug, and works just fine all around. The sole lack of maintainership isn't in my opinion enough to remove the package from the Debian archive.
Cheers, --Seb On Oct/15, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: wikipediafs > Version: 0.3-5 > Severity: normal > > > Please note that according to the website: > > http://wikipediafs.sourceforge.net/ > > Warning! WikipediaFS is currently unmaintained. We are looking for a new > maintainer to take over the development of the project. If you are > interested, please tell us on the project's mailing-list. > > Should an RM be filled ? > > thanks > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 5.0.2 > APT prefers stable > APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > > Versions of packages wikipediafs depends on: > ii fuse-utils 2.7.4-1.1 Filesystem in USErspace > (utilities > ii python 2.5.2-3 An interactive high-level > object-o > ii python-central 0.6.11 register and build utility for > Pyt > ii python-fuse 1:0.2-pre3-9 Python bindings for FUSE > (Filesyst > > wikipediafs recommends no packages. > > wikipediafs suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
