Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > >CGI::Cookie would lead you to belive it follows RFC 2109, when it says > >For full information on cookies see > >http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc2109.txt > I wouldn't read this as 'conforms to', nevertheless: > > >CGI::Cookie uses only the old > >expires field that is in the old netscape cookies spec. > This is still the case with Perl 5.10.1. Is it still a problem with any > browser? Should I forward upstream the request to implement 'Max-Age' now?
I don't have comprehensive knowledge of every browser. The current version of lynx has support for the expires field (in addition to Max-Age). I'd still appreciate it if perl followed the actual RFC, even if every browser has support for the old spec. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
