On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:46:08AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > Package: libdsocksd0 > Version: 1.1.19.dfsg-3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > # apt-cache show libdsocksd0 | grep Depends > Depends: libc6 (>> 2.9), libc6 (<< 2.10), libpam0g (>= 0.99.7.1) > > # apt-cache policy libc6 > libc6: > Installed: 2.9-27 > Candidate: 2.10.1-1 > Version table: > 2.10.1-1 0 > 500 http://cdn.debian.net sid/main Packages > [...] > > Makes the package uninstallable on current Debian/sid. > > Hint: bitlbee has the same problem, see #551775.
Well, as really noted in #551775, this is an artifact of the way libc6 defines its symbols, and it should be solved with a rebuild of the package against the new libc version. How does the wanna-build team feel about scheduling a binNMU for dante and maybe also for bitlbee? Or are there some other issues that I've not considered yet (quite possible, come to think of it)? G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence claims to be an Epimenides paradox, but it is lying.
pgphEo65kBodV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
