As another person who's laptop couldn't even get online with the new udev
(it fails to create device nodes at boot - but if you stop and start udev
then it's ok) I proceeded to read the bug reports against udev.

I am particularly scared by:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309415

Which taken in conjunction with Marco's comments telling people to provide
a patch or stop complaining really worries me.  I am not all happy to have
the maintainer of a boot critical service using that package to support a
crusade against Debian Policy.  If Debian Policy is broken then by all
means follow the process to fix it, but if maintainers of core packages
feel free to deliberately violate policy and refuse simple patches which
make their package more generic and bring it into complience with policy
with _no_ side effects then my faith in Debian is severely diminished.

Marco, please - find it within yourself to follow Debian Policy or hand
the package to someone who will - both the policy on keeping upgrades as
pain-free as possible, and the little things in policy that we users
expect to be followed.

manoj has offered to work on this, but I can see that if I was in the same
position, I wouldn't want to risk the arrogant response vagrant received
for taking the time to provide clear instructions on how to bring udev
into complience with policy.

Bron.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to