Mark Nipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the resolution to 312 and then segfaults. I didn't think the > output itself would be all that helpful unfortunately. Let me
Well, there's a list of supported resolution before that, and 312 isn't in that list. That's a (very) wild guess, and I don't see how it could cause GTK errors. > know if you want me to try out whatever you come up with first or > if you need me to build a new package with the most recent > backend or some such. I'll try to build the new package ASAP. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
