On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:36:01 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian <vagr...@freegeek.org> 
writes:

> understandable. using the logic that the proposed new etherboot
> package would only include roms useful to virtual machines also
> present in the archive could hopefully keep the scope of the package
> sane.

If I understand correctly, the problems are:
   - etherboot ships with rom.gz, which is not usable by qemu, (major)
   - etherboot installed package size is 32MB (minor).

I don't think we have to solve the second point, everyone who is using a
virtualization system can afford the files to be installed, I think a
new binary package is a bigger bloat in this case.  (For everyone, even
for users, who doesn't know or care about what etherboot or qemu/kvm
is.)

We can solve the first problem in different ways:
   - via a new binary package which contains the mentioned roms
     uncompressed,
   - adding libz support to qemu, (how hard this would be?)
   - ship the mentioned roms in the etherboot package uncompressed.

If option 2 is too hard, I prefer option 3.  What is your opinion, it is
a little change in the binary package, nobody will really notice and
only affect people who have etherboot installed.

After this change, kvm/qemu can recommmend on etherboot if they want to
use the roms for pxe support (or depend on it if having the roms are
mandatory for kvm/qemu to even start up).

Gergely



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to