On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare an | > NMU if you want. | | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not | doing things properly :)
Yes, I have a more 'aww shucks' attitude when it comes to versioning of shared libraries. But I probably also do not maintain something that changes as much. That said, were there really ABI/API changes that require libprotobuf[234] and now ...5 ? | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted | ;-) Super -- it's appreciated :) Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
