Hi,
[email protected] (2009-11-02 at 1020.23 +0100):
> What you think should stay in "simple viewer"? EXIF support? Color
> management? Lirc support? GPS support? All these are compile time
> optional external dependencies, which do bring additional libraries.
GPS sounds like a map viewer more than simple image viewer, a highly
specialised task IMHO. Lirc, like a presentation viewer. The other two
are debatable, they are somewhere between simple and complex. Based in
my experience with what others know about those two things ("in my
panel I do not see that black, but it is faster than yours :P", "that
you figured my camera model how?"), more complex than simple. OTOH,
probably make sense to consider them simple if definition of simple is
going to include camera raw formats (!?).
Best would be if upstream makes them run time optional, but no idea
how hard would that be.
GSR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
