On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Vitaly Minko <[email protected]> wrote: > James Vega wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Vitaly Minko <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the update patch. When I forwarded your previous patch to >> Bram, he mentioned that he had received a patch directly from you on the >> same topic. Looking at the patches he released with fixes attributed to >> you (7.2.263, 7.2.264), 7.2.264's description implies that it fixes the >> issue in this bug but it uses a different approach than either >> debian_fix_466088.patch or the updated patch. >> >> Have you sent the updated patch to Bram? Is the updated patch still >> needed based on the patches Bram released? I'll be glad to forward your >> patch on to Bram, but I just wanted to verify its status first. >> >> Thanks for your help! >> > > This issue is still not fixed in the latest svn version. Both 7.2.263 and > 7.2.264 patches fix another bugs. However, 7.2.264 affects the current > issue, because it implements the gui_mch_maximized. Therefore I updated the > patch again (see the attachment). And I didn't send the updated patch to > Bram.
Ok, that's what I thought. Thanks for the update and amended patch. I'll forward it to Bram. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
