On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 10:26:24PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 1. EBUSY indicates that the watchdog is opening it more than once, which > is obviously incorrect behaviour.
To the best of my knowledge watchdog only opens the device once which obviously makes your conclusion wrong as well. > 2. Failure to open the device will not result in the device being > closed, except in the case of (1). Well I can think of different reasons ... > 3. I had a look at the watchdog daemon's source and repeatedly went > "WTF?". I am now inclined to assume it is doing the wrong thing unless > proved otherwise. Now this is a strong accusation that you hopefully have some proof for. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [email protected] VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
